| 
 
 | 
 
   
    | Ratings and Reviews: |   
    | Number 
      of Ratings: 2 | 
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |  
| 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |  |   
    | Weighed
      Average (?):  (8.5/10) |   
    | Average 
      Rating:  (10/10) |   
    | Highest 
      Rating:  (10/10) |   
    | Lowest 
      Rating:  (10/10) |  
 
 
   
    |  |  |  |  |   
    | Reviewer: 
    HuManiMal
  (Edit) | Rating:  | Oct 31, 2011 |   
    |  | What JJ said! (10/10) 
 |  
 
   
    |  |  |  |  |   
    | Reviewer: 
    JimmyJump
  (Edit) | Rating:  | Oct 7, 2010 |   
    |  | Perfect opening paragraph and an example of how to go about things. Why? Because that paragraph contains all the information the reader needs to continue the story without any eyebrows migrating North --it sets the tone of the story, shows the major traits of the narrator through the use of the language and the objectification of the 'subject' which is being prepared by the narrator's house slave. The latter giving, if not a clear, at least an idea of the surroundings. Propmen/-women would call this 'setting the stage'. Or 'staging the set', depending on what medium we're talking about.
 Anyway, Wiley Hunter does a great job of making a low-budget piece look like a big studio production, thanks to sparse, yet well chosen descriptions.
 Again, as in so many of Wiley's stories, the language is harsh, ruthless. But as it usually does with Wiley Hunter, that language, instead of going against the grain, befits the story.
 The story's title is a tad misleading, in the sense that it's not about someone flaunting their wobbly/dangly bits, but about being flaunted.
 Maybe the 'ism' should have been left out of 'exhibitionism'.
 Great 'performance' once again, Wiley!
 JJ (10/10)
 
 |  |  |