|
|
|
|
|
Puss in Boots
Author: C
|
| |
(Added on Jul 12, 2004)
(This month 51047 readers) (Total 59403 readers) |
| |
Puss in Boots meets three wicked fairies. |
| Ratings and Reviews: |
| Number
of Ratings: 5 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| 40% |
20% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
40% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
|
Weighed
Average (?):  (4/10) |
| Average
Rating: (4/10) |
Highest
Rating:  (7/10) |
Lowest
Rating:  (1/10) |
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
Jaeger
(Edit) |
Rating: |
May 29, 2006 |
| |
Nicely done. Has an air of James Herbert about it, though not so dark, and more sexual. A good read. (7/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
crickette
(Edit) |
Rating: |
May 19, 2005 |
| |
I loved your story, Puss in Boots. Your development of his character was right on the money. It had a little bit of everything but nothing was over done. The same can be said for the fairies. Their characters were not overdone. I have never read the original version of Puss in Boots but I have the feeling I will be secretly comparing it to yours in the back of my mine when I do (smile). The story had a great storyline and was not rushed. This is the second story I have read by you tonight and I have not been disappointed yet. (7/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
La Toya
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Apr 29, 2005 |
| |
just bad (1/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
mkemse
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Aug 17, 2004 |
| |
YUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 maybe the worst story i ever ead anywhere (2/10)
|
| |
- Replied by:
Comneno
(Edit) (Aug 23, 2004)
- You must not do much reading.
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
HotGirl1201
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Jul 29, 2004 |
| |
THIS SUCKED!! The plot sucked the writig sucked! DO NOT I REPEAT DO NOT EVER WRITE ANYTHING LIKE THIS AGAIN!! (1/10)
|
| |
- Replied by:
Comneno
(Edit) (Aug 24, 2004)
- Well, HotGirl (a self-designation I'll have to take your word for), I don't ordinarily put much stock in literary criticism from someone who misspells the word "writing." It's obvious to me that the story won't have a strong appeal for everybody, maybe not even for most people (it was written for a pretty narrow segment of the sex fetish population), but it's just as obvious to me that it can't be faulted for the quality of its writing--unless the fault-finder is semiliterate, as you appear to be.
|
|
|
About 